M/S New India Assurance Co Ltd Mumbai v. Bhagubai Tukaram Margal And ORS

24-ca6559-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6559 OF 2010 IN FAST NO.12667 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.V.N.Upadhye, advocate for applicant Mr.Raghuraj Deshmukh, advocate for respondent no.1, 2 and 5 Mr.R.G.hange, advocate for respondent no.5 CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2015 PER COURT :

Heard.

2] Mr.Upadhye, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that the delay in filing the appeal is caused as the petitioner's advocate was not vigilant and the papers were sent to the regional office for sanction.

3] In my view, the delay is sufficiently explained. The delay is, therefore, condoned. The application is accordingly allowed.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp

24-ca6559-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1355 OF 2015 IN FAST NO.12667 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.R.G.Hange, advocate for applicants Mr.V.N.Upadhye, advocate for respondent no.1 CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2015 PER COURT :

Heard.

2] Stand over to 24th February, 2015 at the request of Mr.Hange.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp