Navnath Maniik Waghmare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1093 OF 2017 Navnath s/o Manik Waghmare WRIT PETITION NO. 1094 OF 2017 Shrikrushna s/o Tukaram Dhage WRIT PETITION NO. 1095 OF 2017 Rameshwar s/o Satwaji Purale

{2} WRIT PETITION NO. 1096 OF 2017 Santosh Ashruba Dhage WRIT PETITION NO.1097 OF 2017 Anant s/o Bansidhar Jadhavar WRIT PETITION 1098 OF 2017 Ashok s/o Sambhaji Gitte WRIT PETITION NO. 1099 OF 2017 Bhagwan Sarjerao Shelke

{3} WRIT PETITION NO. 1100 OF 2017 Eknath Bhagwanrao Saybar WRIT PETITION NO. 1101 OF 2017 Rameshwar Pandharinath Phapal WRIT PETITION NO. 1102 OF 2017 Jalindar s/o Kacharu Jogdand

{4} WRIT PETITION NO. 1103 OF 2017 Sominath Bhagwan Gaat WRIT PETITION NO. 1104 OF 2017 Pandurang Ginyandev Vighne WRIT PETITION NO. 1105 of 2017 Angad Ramchandra Devkar

{5} WRIT PETITION NO. 1106 OF 2017 Shrikrushna Vaijnathrao Mate WRIT PETITION NO. 1107 OF 2017 Eknath Vishambhar Lambud WRIT PETITION NO. 1108 OF 2017 Yogesh s/o Pandurang Pawar WRIT PETITION NO. 1109 OF 2017 Dnyanoba Namdeo Bochare

{6} WRIT PETITION NO. 1110 OF 2017 Santoshkumar Bansidharrao Kate WRIT PETITION NO. 1111 OF 2017 Ganesh Vitthal Khade WRIT PETITION NO. 1112 OF 2017 Devidas s/o Ananda Rathod

{7} WRIT PETITION NO. 1113 OF 2017 Dattatraya s/o Bhausaheb Rajgire WRIT PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2017 Dadasaheb s/o Bhaginath Lande WRIT PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2017 Mahadev Ghansham Rathod

{8} WRIT PETITION NO. 1116 OF 2017 Laxman Rambhau Shingade WRIT PETITION NO.1117 OF 2017 Vishnu Rama Avachar CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2017 PER COURT:

1.

Request made by petitioners in the representation dated 25.08.2016 itself is contrary to the scheme framed by the State Government in respect of appointment and functions of Gram Rojgar Sewak. Petitioners have tendered a request to the authorities to consider them eligible for conferment of permanency in employment and to pay monthly wages.

{9} 2.

The scheme framed by the State Government declared under the resolution dated 02.05.2011 stipulates appointment of Gram Rojgar Sewak on part time basis. It is clearly recorded in the scheme itself that payment to the Gram Rojgar Sewak would be in tune with the responsibility conferred upon him. It is however, provided that such Gram Rojgar Sewak would neither be considered as the employee of the State Government, Zilla Parishad or Panchayat Samiti and, the appointment would be purely on temporary basis. They also cannot be considered to be the employees of the concerned Village Panchayat. 3.

Since the scheme itself does not stipulate employment of the concerned Gram Rojgar Sewak on permanent establishment, the request made by petitioners in the representation dated 25.08.2016 cannot be directed to be considered favourably. It would however, be open for the petitioners to make suitable request in consonance with the scheme formulated by the State Government. 4.

Writ petitions accordingly stand disposed of. SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb