Mohammad Atique S/O. Mohammad Siddique Motiwala v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

958.21crapln (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.958 OF 2021 MOHAMMAD ATIQUE S/O. MOHAMMAD SIDDIQUE MOTIWALA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr S. S. Thombre, Advocate for applicant;

Mr S. D. Ghayal, A.P.P. for respondent No.1 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.

DATE : 29th April, 2021 PER COURT:

1.

This matter was heard on 26/04/2021. The learned Advocate for the applicant had sought an adjournment to take instructions. 2.

Today, the learned Advocate submits on instructions that the applicant desires to withdraw this application. A request is made that in the event, the applicant and the original informant settle the dispute amongst themselves, they may be permitted to avail of a remedy on the basis of the consent terms.

3.

In view of the above, this application is disposed off, as withdrawn. In view of the request, the parties would be at liberty to

958.21crapln (2) avail of a remedy as may be permissible in law, in the event of a settlement between the two.

(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk