← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4725/2024disposed off

The Joint Secretary Secondary Rayat Shikshan Sanstha Satara v. Nanasaheb Balaji Shelke And Others

2025-01-31Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:2887-DB 4725.2024CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4725 OF 2024 IN CA/879/2024 THE JOINT SECRETARY SECONDARY RAYAT SHIKSHAN SANSTHA SATARA

VERSUS

NANASAHEB BALAJI SHELKE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Joslen A. Menezes h/f Mr.Paranjape Prakash S.

AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.G.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Mr. R. B. Temak ...

CORAM :

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 31st JANUARY, 2025 ORDER :

.

Heard learned Advocate Mr. Joslen A. Menezes h/f Advocate Mr. P.S. Paranjape for the applicant. 2.

Upon queries he submits that the applicant has not filed any review application for the review of order dated 04.09.2023. He then submits that he be allowed to withdraw the application with liberty to file an application for the review of the order dated 04.09.2023 and also to grant liberty to take further steps in case of review of the said order.

4725.2024CA.odt 3.

At the outset we would say that we cannot go on anticipating that the review of the order dated 04.09.2023 would be allowed in favour of applicant. The order that was sought to be reviewed in the present matter i.e. order dated 26.02.2024 was infact based on the order that was passed by this Court earlier i.e. on 04.09.2023. Now the applicant wants to file an application for review of the said order dated 04.09.2023. If such right is there then the applicant may exhaust the same. Liberty is granted to withdraw this application, however, no further liberty is given because anticipation is not allowed.

4.

The application stands disposed of as withdrawn. [S.G CHAPALGAONKAR ] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE sga/