← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4109/2024application allowed

Dhule Krishi Utpanna Bazar Samiti, Dhule Through Its Secretary Shri Dinkar Barku Patil v. M/S Vijaykumar Madhavji Co. Proprietor L. J. Bhanushali Through L. Rs. B. L. Bhanushali And Others

2024-04-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

915 CRA-132-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4109 OF 2024 IN CRA/132/2019 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 131 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2019 DHULE KRISHI UTPANNA BAZAR SAMITI DHULE THROUGH IT S SECRETARY DINKAR BARKU PATIL

VERSUS

M/S VIJAYKUMAR MADHAVJI COMPANY PROPRIETOR OF LAKHUBHAI JAKHUBHAI BHANUSHALI DHULE ...

Mr. M.S. Kulkarni - Advocate for Applicant Mr. M.H. Patil - Advocate for Respondent ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 26th April, 2024 PER COURT :

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4109 OF 2024 1.

Heard learned Counsel for applicant.

2.

The applicant - A.P.M.C., Dhule is seeking permission to bring on record legal representatives of deceased proprietor Pooja K.

1/2

915 CRA-132-2019 Lakhubhai of respondent - Firm by condoning the delay of 387 days. Admittedly, Lakhubhai has died on 25.12.2022 and, therefore, considering the right to sue his legal representatives are brought on record.

3.

As such, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 'A'.

4.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

5.

Necessary amendment be carried out within stipulated period and after the amendment issue notice to added respondents, returnable two weeks thereafter. 6.

List Civil Revision Application Nos. 132, 130, 131, 134 and 129 of 2019 on 21st June, 2024.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2