The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Agriculture And v. Suryakant Havgirao Dongaonkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 WRIT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2002 THE MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE

VERSUS

SURYAKANT HAVGIRAO DONGAONKAR ...

None present.

...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: October 20, 2018 ...

PER COURT :- None for the parties.

The petitioner / management had challenged the inter locutory order dated 27.11.2001, delivered by the Industrial Court, Solapur, thereby granting interim relief to the respondent / complainant, vide which, he was permitted to work until further orders. By order dated 31.1.2002, this Court admitted the petition and granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (D) thereby staying the impugned inter locutory order. Complaint (ULP) NO.62 of 2001 was not stayed.

Considering the passage of 16 years and the continuance of the akl/d

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2- WRIT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2002 interim relief, I find that this petition can be partly allowed with certain conditions.

This petition is, therefore, partly allowed with the following directions:- (A) In the event Complaint (ULP) No.62 of 2001 is still not decided by the Industrial Court, the interim relief granted by this Court staying the impugned order dated 27.11.2001 would continue for a period upto 28.2.2019 and the Industrial Court shall disposed off the said ULP Complaint on/or before 28.2.2019.

(B) If the said complaint is already decided by the Industrial Court, the interim relief granted by this Court would merge in the judgment of the Industrial Court.

Rule is partly made absolute in above terms.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d