← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12975/2017disposed off

Laxman Kundalik Todmal Through Gpa Bapusaheb Laxman Todmal And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025-09-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:24586 1 978.WP-12975-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 978 WRIT PETITION NO. 12975 OF 2017 LAXMAN KUNDALIK TODMAL THROUGH GPA BAPUSAHEB LAXMAN TODMAL AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. N.C. Garud AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.B.Jadhavar Advocate for Respondent No.3 to 5 : Mr.Dhorde Pramod P. ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 10.09.2025 PER COURT :

.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani Vs.State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2015(6)Mh.L.J.915, against the impugned order, an alternate remedy of revision/appeal is maintainable before the state government. 2.

In view of the same, he seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition and apply to the revisional authority to challenge the impugned order. He also submits that time taken in prosecuting the matter, should be excluded in computing the period of limitation in filling of revision petition.

3.

Leave granted. This petition is permitted to be withdrawn with

2 978.WP-12975-2017.doc liberty as prayed.

4.

In the event, the revision petition is filed within four(04) weeks, time taken in prosecuting the present matter should be excluded in computing the period of limitation in filing revision before the revisional authority.

5.

Interim order is in operation from 20.12.2017 and the same will continue to operate for further period of four (04) weeks from today.

6.

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) vsj..