Satish Vitthalrao Totawar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 63-65

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.12007 OF 2020 Satyawan S/o Babasaheb Thakur ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. S. M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State.

AND WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.12011 OF 2020 Satish S/o Vitthalrao Totawar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. S. M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent-State. ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED : 20th JULY, 2020.

PER COURT:- 1.

The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for all respondents.

2.

It is submitted that validation proceedings in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioners are pending with the scrutiny committee, the same are not decided.

(2) 63-65 3.

Without issuing notice to the petitioners, the respondents have placed the petitioners on the supernumerary posts.

4.

As the impugned orders are without notice to the petitioners, we quashed and set aside the impugned orders.

5.

In case the respondents want to take action against the petitioners placing the petitioners on supernumerary posts or otherwise, then notice shall be issued to the petitioners giving to show cause. In that event, the petitioners can file reply and bring all the relevant facts to the notice of the respondentCommittee. 6.

The Committee shall decide the validation proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months.

7.

The petitioners shall appear before the Committee on 17.08.2020, if the circumstances so permit.

8.

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs (R. G. AVACHAT) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/July-2020