Kashinath Shahaji Late And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
{1} drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1769 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.33877 OF 2016 Ganesh Gangadhar Late APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1770 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.33874 OF 2016 Gangadhar Bapurao Late APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......
Mr. P. R. Kadam, Advocate for the applicants Mr. A. M. Phule, Mr. S. P. Deshmukh and Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGPs for respondent - State Ms. S. D. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.3 .......
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4799 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.5235 OF 2017 Kashinath Shahaji Late APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9807 OF 2017
{2} IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.5241 OF 2017 Vishwanath Shahaji Late APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14208 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.13031 OF 2017 Kashinath Shahaji Late & Another APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......
Mr. Kailas B. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicants Mr. A. M. Phule, Mr. S. P. Deshmukh and Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGPs for respondent - State Ms. S. D. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.3 .......
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 24 th FEBRUARY, 2018 ORDER :
1.
Learned advocates for the parties are at ad idem that delay of similar nature and magnitude as involved in present matters has been condoned by this court under order dated 4th August, 2017 in civil application No. 11899 of 2016 and other connected matters.
{3} 2.
In view of aforesaid, it would be expedient to allow these civil applications as well, since parties concur on that these are a few civil applications in respect of land acquisition under the same notification and from the same village. As such, the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and are disposed of.
3.
Learned advocates for the applicants fairly refer also to that undertaking in those matters were given by the applicants that they would not claim interest for delayed period. 4.
Learned advocates for the applicants on instructions state that an undertaking to said effect would be filed in present matters in addition to the statement already made in civil applications.
5.
Civil applications are accordingly disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca1769-17