← Library
Bombay High CourtARB/15/2019disposed off

Ganesh Goods Transport, Aurangabad Through It S Prop. Ajay Gulabrao Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Food And Urban Supply Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai And Other

2021-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote2 pages

{1} arba1519.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.15 OF 2019 Shri Ganesh Goods Transport, Aurangabad Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.G.K.Naik-Thigle, advocate for the applicant. Mr.S.W.Munde, AGP for Respondents.

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 16th July, 2021.

PC :

The affdavit dated 10.01.2020 placed on record by Respondent No.2, states that as per clause no.27 of the agreement, the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, has nominated the Collector, Aurangabad, to be approached by the applicant for redressing his grievance and the claim of the applicant is pending before the learned Collector. Mr.Thigle, learned Counsel for the applicant, submits that he would be satisfed if the Collector is directed to decide the claim of the applicant within a reasonable period and he would not

{2} arba1519.odt press any other plea as raised in this application. The learned AGP, appearing for Respondents, is agreeable to early decision of the claim of the applicant pending before the Collector.

The statements made by both the learned Counsels is accepted. The Collector, Aurangabad, is directed to decide the claim of the applicant, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order.

The application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (AVINASH G. GHAROTE) JUDGE adb