Uttamrao Dattatrayl Shimpi v. Ramesh Atmaram Shimpi And ORS

ca8231-10 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8231 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.13249 OF 2010 Uttamrao Dattatray Shimpi APPLICANT

VERSUS

Ramesh Atmaram Shimi and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. S. P. Brahme, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S. A. Ambilwade h/f Mr.A. S. Sawant, Advocate for R-1 to 3 .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 18 th NOVEMBER, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the applicant points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Learned advocate for the respondents is not in a position to dispute veracity of the reasons. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filing second appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca8231-10