Bhausaheb Walmikrao Sonawane v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 4896.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4896 OF 2015 Bhausaheb Walmikrao Sonawane .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Milind M. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. Sangita A. Dhumal, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mrs. Geeta Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 09TH JUNE, 2015.

PER COURT :

.

We have heard Mr. Joshi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Deshpande, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 at length. Mr. Joshi, the learned counsel for the petitioner amongst other submissions made, submits that, one post has become vacant after filing of petition. 2.

The petitioner has alternatively prayed that, the petitioner has given representation dated 13.02.2015 and same be decided within one month from the date of order. Considering the nature of the petition, we feel it appropriate to grant prayer clause "C".

2 wp 4896.15 3.

In the light of the above, we pass following order. 4.

The respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall decide the representation dated 13.02.2015 filed by the petitioner within one month from today on its own merits and in accordance with law. The writ petition accordingly is disposed of. 5.

It is made clear that, we have disposed of the petition on the alternative prayer. We have not considered the merits of submissions of the respective parties.

[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 15