Pratibha Kiran Shejwal And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1244.20crapln (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1244 OF 2020 PRATIBHA KIRAN SHEJWAL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Mr V. P. Narwade, Advocate for applicants;

Mr R. B. Bagul, A.P.P. for respondent No.1;

Mr G. D. Jain, Advocate (appointed) for respondent No.2 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.

DATE : 22nd April, 2021 PER COURT:

1.

This matter was heard for some time. We were not inclined to entertain this application.

2.

The learned Advocate for the applicants submits on instructions that the applicants may be permitted to withdraw this application since they are exploring the possibility of all the parties coming together in view of filing of cross first information reports between them. 3.

In view of the above, this application is disposed off as withdrawn, simplicitor and not on the ground that the applicants desire to explore the possibility of a compromise. In the event, the applicants, who are the accused in the impugned first information report, arrive at a compromise with the accused in the other first

1244.20crapln (2) information report, filed by applicant No.1 herein, they may avail of a remedy as may be permissible in law.

4.

Since Shri. Jain was appointed as an Advocate by this Court to represent respondent No.2, his fees are quantified at Rs.2,000/- (Two thousand), to be paid by the High Court Legal Services SubCommittee, Aurangabad. (B. U. DEBADWAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk