Bombay High CourtWP/7595/2007disposed offdismissed for default

Ramkishan Shahu Adsul v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2015-03-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema2 pages

1 WP7595.07

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7595 OF 2007 Ramkishan Shahu Adsul .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Shri A. R. Tapse h/f Shri K. J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner Smt. M. A. Deshpande, A. G. P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 896 OF 2008 Namdev Pandu Adsul ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Shri A. R. Tapse h/f Shri D. N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner Smt. M. A. Deshpande, A. G. P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Shri K. J. Ghute Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 18TH MARCH, 2015.

2 WP7595.07 PER COURT :

1) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A. G. P. for the respondents. The warrant on the basis of which the petitioners are placing reliance has not been found to be genuine. The Commission has also submitted the report holding that, the claim of the petitioners is not genuine. The learned A. G. P. states that, as the Commission has found the claim of the petitioners is not genuine and the source of the warrant is not disclosed, the claim of petitioners can not be considered.

2) In back drop of the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioners are not in a position to explain the source of warrant. The case of the petitioner cannot be considered. Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs.

[ A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] sam/March. 15