← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11120/2006application allowed

Sadashiv Trimbakrao Kulkarni v. Umashivraj Kulkarni And ORS.

2022-02-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages

914 CA 11120 OF 2006.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11120 OF 2006 IN SA/793/2003 SADASHIV TRIMBAKRAO KULKARNI

VERSUS

UMASHIVRAJ KULKARNI and ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicant : Rakhi Sundale h/f Mr. P P Dawalkar. Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.V. Adwant. Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2, 4, 5 : Mr. Alok Sharma.

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 09.02.2022.

PER COURT :

I have heard both the sides.

2.

This is an application for bringing on record the legal representatives of sole appellant with a prayer to condone the delay of 296 days. 3.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, it is allowed. The delay is condoned. Necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks. (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 1/1