← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5346/2025disposed off

Nyati Charitable Foundation Through Its Secretary v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principle Secretary And Others

2025-04-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade3 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:11887-DB ( 1 ) wp 5346.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5346 OF 2025 NYATI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS .....

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jaju Nikhil Santosh Add. G.P. for Respondent/State : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar .....

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE :

28.04.2025 P.C. :- 1.

This is a motion is for speaking to the minutes of order dated 23.04.2025.

2.

The learned advocate points out that in fact it is a matter of registration of four motor vehicles regarding which separate applications were submitted in the prescribed form off-line. He points out that erroneously word 'online' has appeared in paragraph no.1 and erroneously even the other applications except (Page 17), have not been mentioned in paragraph no.2.

( 2 ) wp 5346.25 3.

We have heard both the sides.

4.

Words 'online' from first paragraph shall be deleted. 5.

The number 30, 43 & 56 shall be added after number 17 before closure of the bracket.

6.

The Motion is disposed of. Necessary corrections be carried out and a fresh order be uploaded.

[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.] [MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] mub

wp 5346.25.odt (This order dated 23.04.2025 stands corrected in view of the order dated 28.04.2025, on a motion for speaking to the minutes of the order) 951 WRIT PETITION NO.5346 OF 2025 NYATI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jaju Nikhil Santosh Addl. G.P. for Respondents: Mr. M.M. Nerlikar ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 23.04.2025 PER COURT:

The petitioner - Trust alleges that in spite of submission of application for registration of its motor vehicles in the prescribed form, respondent No.4 is sitting tight for last more than three to four years.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to decide the petitioner's applications dated 01.03.2019 (Page - 17, 30, 43 & 56) in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within five weeks.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mub