Nivrutti Ramkisan Bedare v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others

927-WP.5012-22, oral jud.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5012 OF 2022 Nivrutti s/o Ramkisan Bedare, Age :- 51 years, Occu.- Service, R/o :- At Post - Rakshas-bhuwan, (Tamba), Tq. Shirur (K), Dist. Beed.

... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai -32.

2.

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed.

3.

The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Beed.

4.

The Block Education Officer, Shirur Kasar, Dist. Beed.

... Respondents ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar. AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. A. S. Shinde. Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi. ...

CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA, AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ.

DATE : 05.05.2022 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER R. D. DHANUKA, J.) :- 1.

Rule. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent No.1-State. Learned counsel waives service of

927-WP.5012-22, oral jud.odt notice for respondent Nos.2 to 4. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of the parties. 2.

By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of Mandamus against respondent No.2 to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 20.04.2022, which is pending before the said Authority.

3.

Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within eight (8) weeks from today. The order that would be passed and communicated to the petitioner within one (1) week thereafter. If the order is adverse against the petitioner, the petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. 4.

Writ Petition is allowed in the above terms. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

5.

Parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. (S. G. MEHARE, J.) (R. D. DHANUKA, J.) ...

vmk/-