Vinayak Giridhar Dhanure v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AUG:19913 926-ABA-656-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 656 OF 2025 Vinayak Giridhar Dhanure

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ------------------------- Mr. Shrikant Kawade for the Applicant.

Mr. A. V. Lavte, APP for the State.

------------------------- CORAM :

ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

DATE :

29 JULY 2025 P. C.:

1.

Learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP would agree that these proceedings arise out of same FIR which is a subject matter of the order passed in Anticipatory Bail Application No.614 of 2025. The only difference being that here the Applicant has been protected by the order dated 2 May 2025 in similar facts and circumstances as arise in Anticipatory Bail Application No.614 of 2025. Considering the similarity of the facts and circumstances as also the nature of the accusations and the alleged offences arising out of the same FIR, this Applicant also deserves to be protected. The Application is therefore allowed in terms of the following order:-

ORDER

(i) In the event of arrest of the Applicant in connection with CR No.57 of 2025 registered with Nilanga Police Station, District Latur for the offences punishable under Sections 108, 351(2), Shubham

926-ABA-656-2025.doc 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS, the Applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with one or more sureties in the like amount.

(ii) The Applicant shall cooperate with the investigation and shall attend the concerned police station as and when called by the Investigating Officer, until filing of the charge-sheet. (iii) The Applicant shall furnish details of residential address and other contact details such as mobile number etc. to the concerned police station. If there is any change in the contact details, the same shall be immediately intimated to the concerned police station.

(iv) The Applicant shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission/order of the Court, until the chargesheet is filed. (v) The Applicant shall not influence the witness/es and/or tamper evidence in any manner whatsoever.

2.

Needless to mention that the observations made above are prima facie for the purposes of adjudicating this Application. 3.

The Anticipatory Bail Application is Allowed in the above terms. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] Shubham