Bombay High CourtWP/4709/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Arun Narayanrao Dani And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-11-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi3 pages

(Order) (1) W.P. No. 04709 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 04709 of 2016 District : Aurangabad

1. Arun Narayanrao Dani, Age : 72 years, Occupation : Retired Divisional Accountant, R/o. Flat no. A-2, Shivgaya Complex, Chhatrapati Nagar, Garkheda, Aurangabad.

2. Tukaram Sakharam Takale, Age : 71 years, Occupation : Retired Divisional Accountant, R/o. Roshan Housing Society, Plot No.23, Shridhar Apartment, Flat no.2, Garkheda, Aurangabad.

3. Ratan Chaganrao Gawali, Age : 69 years, Occupation : Retired Accounts Officer, R/o. Plot no.45, Dwarkapuri, Eknath Nagar, Aurangabad.

.. Petitioners.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Energy Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2. The Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Prakash Gad, Bandra (E), Mumbai.

(Order) (2) W.P. No. 04709 of 2016

3. The Director and Second Appellate Authority, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Prakash Gad, Bandra (E), Mumbai.

4. The Chief Executive Director, H.R. Department, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Prakash Gad, Bandra (E), Mumbai.

5. The Chief Engineer, Aurangabad Zone, Mill Corner, Aurangabad.

.. Respondents.

...........

Mr. Narendra D. Sonavane, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. S.W. Munde, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondent no.01.

Respondent nos.02 to 04 served.

Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate, for respondent no.05. ...........

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 01ST NOVEMBER 2017 ORAL ORDER :

01.

Mr. N.D. Sonavane, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners would restrict their prayer to the extent of review filed by them be directed to be decided expeditiously.

(Order) (3) W.P. No. 04709 of 2016 02.

In case, the review application filed by the petitioners is pending before the competent authority, the competent authority shall decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months from the date of this order.

03.

With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( S.V. Gangapurwala ) JUDGE JUDGE ...........

puranik / WP4709.16