← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6919/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Anant Karbhari Pangavhane v. Baburao Waman Kadam

2024-07-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

1 933 ca 6919-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6919 OF 2023 IN SAST/12447/2023 ANANT KARBHARI PANGAVHANE

VERSUS

BABURAO WAMAN KADAM ...

Ms. Mhase Madhaveshwari S., Advocate for Applicant Mr. Wagh Shrinivas S. Advocate for Respondent No.1 ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 18/07/2024.

P. C. :

1.

Leave to mention the delay period in prayer clause-B. 2.

Heard rival submissions.

3.

The applicants are seeking permission to condone the delay of 1139 days in filing second appeal. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 by filing affidavit in reply, strongly opposed the application on the ground that there are concurrent findings of both learned courts below. However, at this juncture the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause-B subject to cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid to the Registry of this court for

2 933 ca 6919-23 utilization of Dispensary, High Court, Aurangabad within two weeks.

4.

Application is disposed of accordingly.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-