← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9714/2019delay condonatedrejected

The C.E.O Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Board, Mhada, Aurangabad v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2021-02-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. G. Sewlikar2 pages

( 1 ) 909 ca 9714.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9714 OF 2019 IN FAST/12644/2019 WITH CA/9715/2019 IN FAST/12644/2019 THE C.E.O MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, MHADA, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mrs. Wadmare Sanghmitra AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.V. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondents : Mr. S.U. Shaikh h/f. Biradar R.D. for R/2 ...

CORAM : M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.

DATE : 10.02.2021 P.C.:- Heard Smt Wadmare. Smt Wadmare submitted that the learned Reference Court decided all the matters arising from the project except the matter under challenge. Therefore, the applicant was not aware of the disposal of this reference. She submitted that the Reference Court has also made a mention of this fact in its award. Learned counsel Shri Shaikh h/f. Biradar for the respondent objects the condonation of delay. 2.

The applicant has made out a sufficient cause for condonation of delay. Learned Reference Court has also observed in its award that this file could not be disposed of for some unavoidable reasons. In view of this, delay

( 2 ) 909 ca 9714.19 is condoned subject to the depositing of the entire amount of compensation with accrued interest thereon within twelve weeks failing which the application for condonation of delay shall stand dismissed. [M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.] mub