← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4388/2012disposed offdismissed for default

Sandip Bhagwan Patil v. The State Of Mah And ORS

2017-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

902_WP438812.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4388 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 13655 OF 2015, 13654 OF 2015, 2847 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4388 OF 2012 Sandip Bhagwan Patil .PETITIONER/APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 779 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4318 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 5897 OF 2015, 2385 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4318 OF 2012 Ujjwala Narayan Ghule .PETITIONER/APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. V.Y Patil, Advocate for petitioners/applicants. Mr. V.S. Badkh, A.G.P. for respondent - State. Mr. V.D. Hon, Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6. ....

CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ DATED : 30th JUNE, 2017 FINAL ORDER :

1.

After hearing learned Counsel appearing for the parties, we are inclined to dispose of present petitions as same are pending since 2012 with 1 / 2

902_WP438812.odt interim order in favour of petitioners, thereby directing Respondent No.3 to decide the pending proposals of petitioners for approval, filed by the management - Respondent Nos. 4 to 6, as early as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks. Interim protection already granted, to continue till decision by Respondent No.3 and for two weeks further, if adverse order is passed and communicate to petitioners.

2.

Both petitions and civil applications therein are disposed of accordingly. No costs.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J. ) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. ) SSD 2 / 2