Madhav Dattatray Pantoji v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 4-8-WP6989-19+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 4 WRIT PETITION NO.6989 OF 2019 VANDANA PANDURANG PANTOJI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER 5 WRIT PETITION NO.6990 OF 2019 SANTOSH PANDURANG PANTOJI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER 6 WRIT PETITION NO.6991 OF 2019 PANDURANG GANGARAM PANTOJI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER 7 WRIT PETITION NO.6995 OF 2019 MADHAV DATTATRAY PANTOJI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER 8 WRIT PETITION NO. 7000 OF 2019 SANDIP DATTATRAY PANTOJI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Vibhute Sunil M. (In all petitions) Addl. G. P. for Respondents in WP No. 6989/2019 & 7000/2019 : Mrs. M.A. Deshpande AGP for respondents in WP No. 6990/2019 : Mr. S. B. Yawalkar AGP for respondents in WP No. 6991/2019 : Mr. K. B. Jadhavar AGP for respondents in WP No. 6995/2019 : Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya.

2 4-8-WP6989-19+.odt CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ DATED : 19th JUNE, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

Mr. Vibhute, the learned advocate for the petitioners submit that the petitioners in these petitions are challenging the show cause notice, however, subsequently the proceedings are decided, as such, the matters have become infructuous.

2.

The learned Additional Government Pleader appears for respondents. 3.

As the matters have become infructuous, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

( MANGESH S. PATIL ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.