Salman Khan Akhtar Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:17561

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 730 OF 2025 Salman Khan Akhtar Khan

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Syed G R APP for Respondents-State: Mr. G. O. Wattamwar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : S. S. Birajdar h/f Ms. Ranjita Mahajan (Appointed) CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : July 08, 2025.

PER COURT :- 1.

The learned appointed Counsel for respondent No.2, Ms. Ranjita Mahajan, is absent. However, learned Counsel Mr. S. S. Birajdar is present on her behalf to represent the cause of respondent No.2. 2.

The learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh bail application in the event the trial does not conclude within one year. 3.

Accordingly, the application stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

4.

As the learned appointed Counsel Ms. Ranjita Mahajan for respondent No.2 is absent, the fees are not quantified in the present matter. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.

Page 1 of