← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1613/2015

Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Latur v. Pranav Tukaram Aradwad And Others

2015-10-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala2 pages

1 ca 1594.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1594 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12895 OF 2014 Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Latur .. Applicant

Versus

Gurunath Gunderao Pune and others .. Respondents Mrs. Kalpalata B. Bharaswadkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. P. G. Sontakke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. WITH C. A. NO. 1591 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 12881 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1613 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 12680 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1606 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 12863 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1609 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 12867 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1597 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 12888 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1600 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 12875 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1603 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 12871 OF 2014 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 28TH OCTOBER, 2015.

PER COURT :

.

Heard Mrs. Bharaswadkar and Mrs. Sontakke, the learned counsel for respective parties. Mrs. Sontakke, the learned counsel opposes the applications on the ground no sufficient

2 ca 1594.15 cause is stated.

2.

It appears that, the applicant is a corporation. The present applicant was not added as party in the capacity of corporation, but the Executive Engineer of Irrigation Division was added as party. The impugned award is executable against the corporation and it is only after the applicant got the knowledge, the proceedings for obtaining certified copies, legal opinion were taken up.

3.

In the light of the above and for the reasons stated in applications, the applications are allowed. The delay is condoned. The civil applications are disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 15