Sarswatibai Maruti Mane Died Lrs Gopabai Tanaji Solankar And Another v. The Collector Osmanabad And Others

1 wp 4754.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4754 OF 2016 Saraswatibai Maruti Mane died through L.Rs. Gopabai Tanaji Solankar and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The Collector Osmanabad and others .. Respondents Shri Vivekanand V. Ingale, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri A. V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri S. B. Bhosale, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4757 OF 2016 Sukhababu Ramchandra Ambar died through L.Rs. Sheshabai Sukhababu Ambar and other .. Petitioners

Versus

The Collector Osmanabad and others .. Respondents Shri Vivekanand V. Ingale, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri B. A. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri S. B. Bhosale, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4759 OF 2016 Ravindra Madhavrao Ambar died through L.Rs. Hanumant Ravindra Ambar died through L.Rs.

Bhagshree Hanumant Ambar and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The Collector Osmanabad and others .. Respondents

2 wp 4754.16 Shri Vivekanand V. Ingale, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri B. A. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri S. B. Bhosale, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 27TH APRIL, 2016.

PER COURT :

.

The learned Assistant Government Pleaders appear for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in respective writ petitions. Mr. Bhosale, the learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 3 in all matters.

2.

The limited grievance made by petitioners is that, the petitioners had filed proceedings U/Sec. 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act (for "L. A. Act") in the year 2014 and 2015 as stated in the petitions. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the same is not decided.

3.

The learned Assistant Government Pleaders submit that, if the said applications U/Sec. 28-A of the L. A. Act filed by petitioners are pending with the authorities, the authorities would decide the same on its own merits.

4.

Considering the above, we pass following order.

3 wp 4754.16 5.

The respondent authorities with whom petitioners have filed applications U/Sec. 28-A of the L. A. Act shall decide the said proceedings if pending before it expeditiously, in accordance with law and after hearing all the parties concern within a period of four (04) months from today. The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/April 16