Nana Narayan Yede v. The Superintending Engineer Irrigation Project Aurangabad And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5938 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3927 Of 2002 NANA NARAYAN YEDE APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Mr.V.P.Golewar, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr.A.B.Basarkar, AGP for the respondent / State. ( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) DATE : 05/05/2016 PER COURT :

1.

The applicant/original respondent submits that the GR dated 24/04/2001 mandates that the petitioner/State shall implement clause 2 and 3 (on internal page No.5) and thereby bring the applicant on C.R.T.E. Mr.Golewar further submits that the petitioner/State has informed the applicant by communication dated 18/03/2011 that since WP No.3927/2002 is pending before this Court, the proposal for bringing the applicant on C.R.T.E. has not been processed.

2.

The learned AGP submits on instructions that due to the khs/May 2016/5938-d

pendency of the writ petition and the interim order dated 26/11/2002, the State has not processed the proposal of the applicant in the light of the said GR.

3.

Considering the above, this application is allowed only to the extent of permitting the petitioner/State to proceed for considering the proposal of the applicant in terms of the GR dated 24/04/2001 for bringing him on C.R.T.E. Needless to state, this order shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. It is expected that the proposal shall be considered and acted upon within a period of 4 (four) months.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) khs/May 2016/5938-d