Jaidipsing Ravindrasingh Jadhav v. Dayanand Pundalik Joshi And ANR

904-ca-949-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 949 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 12441 OF 2020 JAIDIPSING RAVINDRASINGH JADHAV

VERSUS

DAYANAND PUNDALIK JOSHI AND ANOTHER ....

Mr. P.C. Mayure, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S.S. Dargad, Advocate h/f Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 14th JANUARY, 2022 PER COURT:- 1.

It is an application for condonation of delay moved by the applicant / original claimant.

2.

Heard. Mr. P.C. Mayure, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S.S. Dargad holding for Mr. S.G Chapalgaonkar, learned counsel for respondent no.2 3.

There seems to be delay of 87 days in preferring the first appeal.

904-ca-949-21 4.

For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay in para nos. 3 to 5, and looking to the nature of the injury claim, the delay needs to be condoned in the interest of justice.

O R D E R

(i) The application is hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

(ii) The Registry to make scrutiny of the appeal and it be numbered and place before the concerned Court for admission. (iii) Civil application is accordingly disposed of. [ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ] JUDGE S.P. Rane