Prayagbai Digambar Gaikawad v. Sundar Rangnathrao Pawar And Another

{1} 936 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1472 OF 2015 IN FAST/12879/2014 PRAYAGBAI DIGAMBAR GAIKAWAD

VERSUS

SUNDAR RANGNATHRAO PAWAR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for applicant : Mr. Manisha R. Dhule Adv. for Respondent No. 2: Mr. A. S. Usmanpurkar CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 16th August, 2017.

PER COURT:

1] Heard the learned counsel for applicant/appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.2 Insurance Company. 2] Despite service of notice to respondent No.1 none appears on his behalf. There is a meager delay of 29 days in filing the appeal. According to learned counsel for the applicant, delay was not intentional and deliberate but caused due to unavoidable circumstances. The matter pertains to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. 3] In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, delay is hereby condoned. The application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Registry to take requisite steps for further process. On registration of appeal, Admit. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 Insurance Company

{2} 936 sr.no..odt waives service for said respondent. Notice of admission of appeal be issued to respondent No.1.

4] After procedural compliance, appeal be listed for final hearing in due course.

[K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.

grt/-