Dhanaraj Madhav Munde v. The General Manager, Personal And Industrial Relation Department And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4826 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.S.G.Jadhavar, advocate for the petitioners. Mrs.R.D.Reddy, advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.S.G.Chapalgaonkar, advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.

Date : 27.01.2015.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Mr.Jadhavar, learned counsel submits that the petitioner has secured 48 marks and he had applied from NT(D) category. The petitioner is non-apprentice. According to the learned counsel, one Mr.Tandale who has got 47 marks is shown in the select list though he has received less marks than the petitioner. The same is not permissible.

3.

Mr.Chapalgaonkar, learned counsel submits that initially there was a mistake in the select list as MSRTC had not properly given instructions. In the final select list not a single candidate below the petitioner is appointed from NT(D) non-apprentice

category for the post of Assistant Sheet Metal. 4.

In view of the said statement made by the learned counsel for MKCL that no candidate below the petitioner in merit is appointed from NT(D) category, the claim of the petitioner can not be considered.

5.

The Writ Petition as such is disposed of. No costs. (V.L.ACHLIYA,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt..27.01.2015.

asp/office/wp4826.13