← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6115/2020disposed off

Raghunath Rama Jathar And Others v. Jagannath Rama Jathar

2023-04-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi3 pages

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6115 OF 2020 Raghunath Rama Jathar And Others

...Petitioners

Versus

Jagannath Rama Jathar

...Respondent

Mr. Manoj Shelke, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shaikh Shoyab, Advocate for the respondent. .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 11 th APRIL, 2023 ORDER :

1.

By the impugned order passed by 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Paranda, below Exhibit-33 in Regular Civil Suit No. 929/2016, the Trial Court has allowed the application filed by the plaintiff and directed measurement of suit property of plaintiff by appointing Deputy Superintendent of Land Record. 2.

Respondent/plaintiff filed suit for perpetual injunction in respect of suit property, admeasuring 2 Hectare 11 Are, out of total area of 5 Hectare 37 Are, in Gat No. 98, situated at Mauje Bavchi, Taluka-Paranda, District- Osmanabad. In the alternate prayer for measurement of suit land and fixation of its

{2} boundaries is also made. Defendants/petitioners appeared and resisted the suit by filing written statement contending that it is the plaintiff who is encroaching in the land owned by defendants. 3.

Plaintiff filed application Exhibit-33 for measurement of suit land by appointing Taluka Inspector of Land Records, Paranda. Defendants filed say to the application requesting the Trial Court to direct measurement of entire Gat No. 98. The Trial Court has allowed the application by only directing measurement of the land of plaintiff. Hence, the present petition. 4.

Upon hearing learned advocate for the petitioners and learned advocate for the respondent and on going through grounds raised in the writ petition, documents annexed thereto and the impugned order, this Court is of the opinion that impugned order needs to be modified.

5.

There appears boundary dispute between plaintiff and defendants and in the suit a prayer is also made for fixation of boundaries and measurement of suit land. Taking into consideration the pleadings of the parties, to resolve the controversy between the parties, the Trial Court ought to have

{3} directed measurement of land of the plaintiff and defendants in Gat No. 98. This would help the Trial Court to effectively adjudicate the dispute between the parties. Hence, the following order:

ORDER

(i) Writ petition is allowed.

(ii) Impugned order dated 27.02.2020, passed by 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Paranda, below Exhibit-33 in Regular Civil Suit No. 929 of 2016 is modified to the effect that Deputy Superintendent of Land Records, Paranda, shall measure the property in possession of plaintiff and defendants in Gat No. 98, situated at Mauje Bavchi, Taluka-Paranda, DistrictOsmanabad, and shall fix the boundaries thereof. Defendants shall pay necessary measurement fees in the Trial Court.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]