Prashant Bansilal Bumb v. The State Of Mah And ORS

{1} pil10212.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.102 OF 2012 Prashant Bansilal Bumb Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.R.M.Deshmukh, advocate holding for Mr.S.S.Shete, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.A.R.Kale, AGP for Respondents.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ AND S.M.GAVHANE, J J.

DATE : 26th February, 2020.

P.C. :

Shri R.M.Deshmukh, learned advocate holding for Shri S.S.Shete, advocate for the petitioner, submitted that because of the subsequent event i.e. inclusion of villages within the limits of Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive.

It is further submitted that the petitioner has given instructions to withdraw the petition.

The Public Interest Litigation is disposed as withdrawn. In the circumstances, the parties shall bear their own costs. S.M.GAVHANE Z.A.HAQ JUDGE JUDGE adb