Nitin Kondibabhau Rodge v. Nanasaheb Dattarao Sapate And Another

7420.2014CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7420 OF 2014 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 13069 OF 2014 Nitin s/o Kondibabhau Rodge ...Applicant

Versus

Nanasaheb s/o Dattarao Sapate and another ...Respondents ...

Mr. Jadhav Kailas B., Advocate for applicant ...

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

Date: 6th January, 2017 PER COURT:

1.

Learned advocate for the applicant points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Veracity of the reasons is not challenged. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filing second appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause (B) and is disposed of. (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH) JUDGE VDK