Annasaheb S/O Madhav Shinde v. Bhausaheb B. Parakhe And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 76 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7616 OF 2022 IN FAST/12774/2022 ANNASAHEB S/O MADHAV SHINDE

VERSUS

BHAUSAHEB B. PARAKHE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sunil Nimbalkar h/f. Mr. Gandhi Amol S.

Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. A. B. Gatne ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 30.01.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1024 days which appears to be caused due to his financial crisis. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 - Insurance Company strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. However, considering the statutory right of the applicant, the delay of 1024 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

2.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-