Ghanshyam Narayanrao Sonnekar And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12335 OF 2019 IN FAST/13122/2019 GHANSHYAM NARAYANRAO SONNEKAR AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S. N. Dudhate h/f. Mr. Jogdand Patil Vijay B.

AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. P. N. Kutti Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Ms. K. M. Daskhedkar h/f. Mr. Ruturaj C. Patil ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 23/09/2022.

....

PER COURT. :

Heard rival submissions. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 1398 days which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants the delay of 1398 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.

2.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ) JUDGE shp/-