← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/637/2019disposed off

Pandurang Balasaheb Kailewad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2021-04-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. U. Debadwar3 pages

..1.. CrWP.636.2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.636 OF 2019 Pandurang Balasaheb Kailewad, Age : 35 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o. A-2, Guruprasad Nagar, Beed Bypass Road, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

.. Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra The Commissioner of Police Commissioner Office, Aurangabad The Superintendent of Police, Department of Civil Rights Protection, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad.

4.

Police Inspector, Economical Offences Wing, Office of Police Commissioner, Aurangabad City, Aurangabad .. Respondents ...

WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.637 OF 2019 Pandurang Balasaheb Kailewad, Age : 35 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o. A-2, Guruprasad Nagar, Beed Bypass Road, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

.. Petitioner

Versus

..2.. CrWP.636.2019 1.

The State of Maharashtra The Commissioner of Police Commissioner Office, Aurangabad Police Inspector (I.O.), Economical Offences Wing, Office of Police Commissioner, Aurangabad City, Aurangabad 4.

Police Inspector, Vedantnagar Police Station, Aurangabad.

.. Respondents ...

In both the matters :

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr V.P. Latange APP for respondent nos.1 to 4 : Mr R.V. Dasalkar ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.

Date : 19-04-2021 PER COURT :- 1.

We have considered the grievance of the petitioner. His land at Parbhani has been allegedly sold off by an impostor to persons at Parbhani. The false sale documents are prepared at Nanded. The petitioner is residing at Aurangabad.

..3.. CrWP.636.2019 In view of the above, the petitioner would lodge a complaint before the concerned Police Station either at Parbhani or at Nanded. The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner would lodge a complaint before the competent Police Station at Parbhani considering that the land at issue is at Parbhani.

In view of the above, both these petitions are disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to lodge his complaint before the Police Station having jurisdiction, at Parbhani. The time spent by the petitioner in lodging his complaints earlier on 04-12-2018 and 27-02-2019 at Aurangabad, till disposal of these petitions, would be considered as an explanation for the delay in filing a complaint at Parbhani.

(B. U. DEBADWAR) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) JUDGE JUDGE