← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5459/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Tukaram Baliram Poul And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-06-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

Writ Petition No.5459/2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5459 OF 2017 Tukaram s/o Baliram Poul and others ...

PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri S.B. Bhosale, Advocate for petitioners Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for State Shri A.D. Aghav, Advocate for respondent No.5 Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent No.6 .....

CORAM:

ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED:

23rd June, 2017.

FINAL ORDER :

1.

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2.

On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition, mainly on the ground that before passing the order dated 10/4/2017 by Zilla Parishad, no opportunity whatsoever was given to the petitioners as required under the law.

Therefore, the impugned communication of cancellation of No Objection Certificate, in our

Writ Petition No.5459/2017 view, is unsustainable on this ground alone. Therefore, we are inclined to quash and set aside the same with liberty to the respondents to pass appropriate orders after hearing the parties, as early as possible, preferably within two weeks, keeping in mind the new transfer policy dated 27/2/2017 read with the policy dated 24/4/2017.

3.

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty. Rule made absolute in above terms. All contentions are kept open.

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (ANOOP V. MOHTA) JUDGE JUDGE fmp/