← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1978/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The Exe. Engineer Minor Irrigation Div., Osmanabad And ORS v. Shesharao Kisan @ Keshav Bhadare

2025-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:9401 1 PB(i).CA.-1978-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1978 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27702 OF 2013 THE EXE. ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIV., OSMANABAD AND ORS

VERSUS

SHESHARAO KISAN @ KESHAV BHADARE ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mrs. Biradar Meera T. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pravin B. Rakhunde ...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 27th MARCH 2025 PER COURT :

1. The Applicants are praying condonation of delay of 1747 days in filing Application for restoration of First Appeal which was dismissed for default in pursuance of order dated 05.06.2018. The grounds for condonation of delay are stated in Paragraph Nos.4 and 5 of the Application.

2. Learned Counsel for the Applicants prays to condone the delay as it was not intentional.

3. Learned Counsel Mr. Rakhunde appearing for Original Claimant submits that though original claimant died, he has already filed

2 PB(i).CA.-1978-2025.doc application giving intimation to the Applicant-Acquiring Body about death and the legal heirs. He submits that he represents the legal heirs of the deceased-Applicant. He would oppose the application as delay is inordinate and it has not been properly explained.

4. I have gone through Paragraph Nos. 2 to 4 of the Application. I do not find that there is any material to contradict the averments. Considering the submission of learned Counsel for the Applicants, I find it fit to condone the delay.

5. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' and 'C'.

6. Office is directed to restore the First Appeal Stamp No.27702/2013 to its original position.

SHAILESH P. BRAHME JUDGE NAJEEB..