← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6129/2020disposed off

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur v. Vasant Pandharinath Jadhav And ORS

2021-01-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. G. Sewlikar3 pages

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6129 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1584 OF 2019 The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Divison, Latur Applicant

Versus

Vasant Pandharinath Jadhav & others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6128 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL N O. 1585 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6130 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1589 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6131 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1590 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6132 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1588 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6133 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1586 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6135 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1587 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6136 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1593 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6137 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1594 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6138 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1595 OF 2019 WITH

- 2 - CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6139 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1597 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6140 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1596 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6141 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1591 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6142 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1592 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6143 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1599 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6144 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1598 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6146 OF 2020 I N FIRST APPEAL NO. 1602 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6147 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1601 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6148 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1600 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6149 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1603 OF 2019 Mr. S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.V.Virdhe, AGP for respondent-State.

Mr. L.C. Patil, Advocate for acquiring body.

CORAM : M.G. Sewlikar, J.

DATE : 8th January, 2021.

PER COURT :

- 3 - 1.

Heard both the sides.

2.

Shri Patil, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection for transposition as the State is being transposed as coappellant. 3.

In view of this, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

4.

Application is disposed of accordingly.

( M. G. SEWLIKAR ) JUDGE dyb