Vinod Prakash Sonawane v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1117 OF 2020 Vinod Prakash Sonawane Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. H. P. Randhir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav, APP for the State.

Ms. Jayshree Ghorpade, Advocate (appointed) for respondent No. 2. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI & R. M. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2023.

PER COURT :

1.

Respondent No. 2 is duly served. However, none appears on her behalf.

2.

Learned counsel Ms. Jayshree Ghorpade is appointed to espouse the cause of respondent No. 2.

3.

Learned counsel for petitioner states that during the pendency of this petition charge-sheet has been fled. He seeks leave to amend the application and place on record copy of charge-sheet.

- 2 - 4.

Leave granted. Amendment be carried out within one week.

5.

Stand over to 23rd February, 2023.

( R. M. JOSHI) ( SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI) Judge Judge dyb

- 3 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1094 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1117 OF 2020 Vinod Prakash Sonawane Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. H. P. Randhir, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav, APP for the State.

Ms. Jayshree Ghorpade, Advocate (appointed) for respondent No. 2. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI & R. M. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2023.

PER COURT :

1.

Learned counsel for applicant states that this application for restoration was fled since the applicant was under wrong impression that the matter was dismissed. He seeks leave to withdraw the application.

2.

Leave granted. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

( R. M. JOSHI) ( SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI) Judge Judge dyb