Ravi Bharat Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

5069.2014 WP.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5069 OF 2014 ...

RAVI BHARAT PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Santosh S. Jadhavar AGP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. V.H.Dighe Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. M.S.Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. P.S.Patil ...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

Dated: September 22, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1] The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.4, on written instructions, makes a statement that, the tribe claim of the respondent No.3 has been invalidated by the Respondent No.4. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, while deciding the Original Application filed by the present petitioner, in para 14 made following observations:

As such, for the present the applicant has no cause to claim the relief mentioned above, however, we observe that, if ultimately the Committee decides the issue of caste validity certificate of Shri Yogesh Baviskar, then the applicant is entitled to file fresh original

5069.2014 WP.odt application before this Tribunal. With this liberty, original application will have to be dismissed. Hence, the order:

ORDER

The original application stands dismissed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

2] In the light of above observations, and the statement of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 that, the tribe claim of the respondent No.3 is invalidated, the petitioner can again approach to the Tribunal, by filing Original Application. In that view of the matter, the Petition is disposed of.

3] In case the petitioner files fresh Original Application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal to decide the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months, from filing of such Original Application. Sd/- Sd/- ( A.M. BADAR, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) DDC