Irfana Begum Shaikh Maheboob v. Shaikh Gausia Nilophar Shaikh Nijamoddin And Others

{1} ca549116.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5491 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3069 OF 2012 Irfana Begum Shaikh Maheboob Applicant

Versus

Smt. Shaikh Gausiya Nilophar Shaikh Niamoddin & others Respondents Mr.R.I.Wakade, advocate for the applicant.

Mr.P.V.Suryawanshi, advocate for original petitioners Mr.G.R.Syed, advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.B.A.Shinde, advocate for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 29th June, 2021.

PC :

In spite of suffcient opportunities having been granted to the original petitioner, no reply has been fled to this application. By this application, the applicant seeks his impleadment to the writ petition on the ground that he has been appointed in the vacancy created due to the termination of the petitioner, by following due process of law and, therefore, he is vitally interested in the outcome of the present petition as the same would naturally affect him.

Considering the submissions made above, Civil

{2} ca549116.odt Application No.5491 of 2016 is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to implead the applicant as Respondent No.4 to the present petition. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today. Upon amendment being carried out, Mr.R.I.Wakade, advocate waives notice for newly added Respondent No.4.

List the petition after two weeks, by which time, Mr.R.I.Wakade, learned Counsel for newly added Respondent No.4, shall fle reply affdavit on record, if he so desires. The matter shall be heard and decided fnally at the admission stage. (AVINASH G. GHAROTE) JUDGE adb