Chandrakant Nimbaji Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 1043-wp-6369-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6369 OF 2019 Chandrakant Nimbaji Patil ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. V. M. Jaware, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for respondent No. 1 - State. ....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ DATED : 06 th JUNE, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that exparte stay has been granted by the respondent No.1 in appeal filed by respondent No.3. Though the petitioner had appeared, however, the appeal is not decided.

2.

The learned AGP accepts notice for respondent No.1 and submits that, as the appeal is pending with respondent No.1, it would be decided on its own merits.

3.

In case, the appeal is pending before respondent No.1 as claimed by the petitioner, then the respondent No.1 shall take decision on the appeal on its own merits in accordance with law

2 1043-wp-6369-19.doc after hearing all the parties concerned expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from today.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE SMS