Chitrabai Shivling Karle v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Osmanabad And ORS
2024:BHC-AUG:24106
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7778 OF 2024 IN X-OBJ/142/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7776 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/12466/2024 VITHAL S/O MARUTI FAND DIED HIS LRS. PARVATI AND ORS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Shashikiran N AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. K.B. Jadhavar Advocate for Respondents : Ms. Sunita Shelke 51 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7770 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/12461/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7782 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/12458/2024 MALLAPPA KALLAPPA DEVMANKAR (DIED) THR LRS SUDHAKAR MALLAPA DEVMANKAR THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. K.S. Hoke Patil Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Vinod Prakash Patil and Mr.Arun Hanumant Koralkar ...
AND
52 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7771 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/12464/2024 NIRMALABAI BABURAV MENGSHETTI THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. K.B.Jadhavar ...
AND 53 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7772 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/12450/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7780 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/12453/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7775 OF 2024 IN X-OBJST/12455/2024 CHAYABAI SHIVAJI BHANDARKAWTHE THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. P.D.Patil ...
AND 54 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7779 OF 2024 IN X-OBJ/144/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7777 OF 2024 IN X-OBJ/143/2024
GURULING BALI CHAUGULE THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ANR AGP for Respondents/State : Mr.V.S. Badakh CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE : 04.10.2024.
PER COURT :
1.
These Civil Applications are filed for condonation of delay of 138 days caused in filing appeal and cross-objections respectively. The Cross-Objections are filed by the Original Claimants for enhancement of the amount of compensation. 2.
The applications for condonation of delay are objected by learned Advocate Ms. Shelke for respondents. 3.
For the reasons recorded in the applications, the applications stand allowed. Delay stands condoned respectively.
4.
The Civil Applications stand disposed off.
5.
Office to register Cross Objections.
( KISHORE C. SANT ) JUDGE mahajansb/