Sanjay Sukhdeo Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

1 926-WP-5079-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5079 OF 2022 SANJAY SUKHDEO JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Jaju Nikhil Santosh AGP for Respondents/State: Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari Advocate for Respondent No.4: Mr. K. D. Bade Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5: Mr. S. K. Kadam ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

DATE : 5th May, 2022 ORDER :

1.

The petitioner raised objection for inclusion the names of respondent nos.6 to 191 in the final voters list of respondent no.4/Society. The said objection is rejected by respondent no.2. It is the claim of the petitioner that respondents do not possess 10 R land within the area of operation of respondent no.4/Society. 2.

Since this petition raises several disputed questions of fact, it is not possible to entertain the petition at this stage.

2 926-WP-5079-2022.odt 3.

In view of the Division Bench decision in Dattatray Genaba Lole and Others Vs. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune and Others reported in 2022(1) BomCR 471, the petitioner has alternate remedy. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy. All contentions of the petitioner are kept open.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] Sameer