The State Of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Vasantrao Deshmukh

1 24-crappln2788-14 and anr.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2788 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2787 OF 2014 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant

Versus

Madhukar Vasantrao Deshmukh ..Respondent -- Mrs.B.B.Gunjal, APP for applicant - State Mr.V.C.Patil - Ashtekar, advocate for respondent - sole -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : JUNE 11, 2015 PER COURT :

Heard both sides.

2] It is an admitted fact that an appeal is now filed by the complainant before the Sessions Court and the same is even admitted.

3] In the circumstances, present applications for condonation of delay as as well as for grant of

2 24-crappln2788-14 and anr.odt leave to file appeal are superfluous. There is no need to condone the delay or to grant leave to file appeal.

4] Both the applications are, therefore, rejected.

5] The appeal filed before the Sessions Court to continue as per the due procedure of law.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp