The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Pratiksha Anilrao Kanhe

(1) CA No.9614/2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9614 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13688 OF 2018 State of Maharashtra and another.

Applicants.

Versus

Pratiksha Anilrao Kanhe.

Respondent.

*** Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for the applicants. Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the respondent. *** CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.

Dated :

10th August , 2018.

PER COURT :- .

Heard learned Additional Government Pleader for the applicants and Mr. Jadhavar, learned Counsel for the non-applicant. Mr. Jadhavar, the learned Counsel opposes the application on the ground that no sufficient cause is stated.

2.

The applicants have stated about the correspondence

(2) CA No.9614/2018 that was required to be made and obtain sanction from the Law and Judiciary Department for filing the Review. These averments stand uncontroverted.

3.

For the reasons stated in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

4.

Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE vdd/