Rukhman Maroti Kamble v. Maroti Tutaram Kambale

(1) criwp588.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.588 OF 2014 Rukhman Maroti Kamble ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Maroti Tukaram Kamble ..RTESPONDENT Mr S.B. Kadu, Advocate for petitioner;

Mr S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 31th August, 2015 ORAL ORDER :

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

There are concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below, in the present matter, particularly in terms of the provisions of section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Courts below noticed that the claim was time barred.

3.

In the earlier round of litigation, the order of refusal of maintenance passed by the learned Court below, was not resisted by the petitioner. In view thereof, no case for interference is made out. Criminal Writ Petition fails and stands dismissed.

(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) amj