Tanaji Narharrao Deshmukh And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 1000,1074-wp-6322,6402-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6322 OF 2019 Tanaji Narharrao Deshmukh and others ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. A. R. Tapse, Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. A. B. Girase, Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr. V. M. Chate, Advocate for respondent Nos. 8 and 9. ....

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6402 OF 2019 Ramrao Narayanrao Mundhe and others ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. A. R. Tapse, Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. A. B. Girase, Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1 - State. Mr. V. M. Chate, Advocate for respondent No.2. ....

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ DATED : 06 th JUNE, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

Heard.

2.

The grievance raised in the instant petitions is no more resintegra and is covered by the Judgment delivered by this Court on 16.12.2014 in Writ Petition No. 6116 of 2014 and other companion matters.

2 1000,1074-wp-6322,6402-19.doc 3.

For the reasons recorded while disposing of the aforesaid Writ Petitions, the instant Writ Petitions also deserve to be allowed and the same are hereby allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioners for grant of two increments, as per the policy of the Government and in consonance with the judgment referred to above, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today.

4.

The Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs. ( MANGESH S. PATIL ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE SMS