Trimbak Dattatrya Jathar v. Satyabhamabai D.Jatha(Decd)Lrs Prbhavati And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:1879

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 SECOND APPEAL NO. 177 OF 1992 WITH X-OBJECTION NO. 19 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8908 OF 2013 IN SA/775/2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8988 OF 2013 IN SA/177/1992 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 775 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4764 OF 2004 IN SA/775/2004 TRIMBAK DATTATRYA JATHAR

VERSUS

SMT. SATYABHAMABAI LRS PRABHAVATI MADHUKAR SARAF O Mr. V. S. Bedre, Advocate for the appellant Mr. V. P. Golewar h/f Mr. V. J. Dixit, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 5 Mr. Y. V. Kakade h/f Mr. N. V. Gaware, Advocate for respondent no.7

CORAM

: R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE 22nd JANUARY, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Learned counsel Mr. Bedre has placed on record notice dated 15th January, 2024 indicating that the appellants are duly served with the notice whereby he is requests his desire for withdrawal of appearance for want of instructions. The copy of the notice and tracking report is taken on record and marked 'X' collectively for the identification. Hence, appearance of learned counsel Mr. Bedre is discharged. 2.

Since it was informed by the learned counsel for the appellant about his discharge from the proceedings, it was a duty of the appellant to take steps to cause appearance before the Court. Absence of 2.sa177.92.odt

appellant indicates that he has no intention to prosecute the appeal. Hence, appeals stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 2.sa177.92.odt